|
The
First Lady of Lyndon - The Letters of Mary Barker (1655-79) |
|
|
|
|
|
Second
Marriage |
|
As an eligible
widower, the upwardly mobile Abel Barker made no haste to fill the gap left by
the death of his lamented wife Anne. England was in turmoil, although the
execution of King Charles I leaves no record among the letters so meticulously
copied into Abel Barkers letter book (DE730/4). Often addressed to fellow
members of Rutlands Parliamentarian County Committee, these chart
concerns with taxes and rents, land deals and local intrigues. Influential
acquaintances and relatives on both sides of the political divide were
carefully cultivated. |
|
(DE 730/4 224) |
|
|
|
Mary Noel of Whitwell
was an astute choice. When the political climate changed, her family
connections brought valuable benefits to the aspiring local dignitary. Geoffrey
Palmer was to become Charles I I s Attorney General; his sister had
married Alexander Noel, youngest brother of the first Viscount Campden (Wright
1684, 109). |
|
(DE 730/1 43). |
|
|
|
I hope you got safe
and well to London, and by this time are ready to return to her who mourns for
your absence. Hambleton is a sad place without your dear company. I trust to
God you will stay no longer than needs you must. My daily prayers are to God
for your health and safe return to me. It is out of the earnest desire I have
to manifest my dear affection to you that makes me trouble thee with this. God
send you good success in your business. I remain, your faithful loving wife,
Mary Barker |
|
[P.S. along side of
page] Remember to buy me some sherry of amber. I
pray you buy me a laced pinner and coif of the new fashion for myself and l
would have a satin mantle for my child to christen it in, let it be either blue
or red satin which[ ever] you can best get and laced with a broad silver lace
and lined with sarsnet. You might buy it cheaper than I can get anybody
[to] do it for me, if
you have time. If not, stay not to do it, and I will send afterwards to
somebody. |
|
(DE 730/1 45) |
|
|
|
I pray you, buy me a bell
to ring up the maids to me out of the kitchen for I cannot make them hear call
[I] never so loud. I will trouble you with no more for fear of hindering your
return... Mall [Mary] presents you with her duty by, dear Heart, your truly loving
wife Mary Barker. |
|
(DE 730/1 72A) |
|
|
|
The end of the
1650s, and with them Cromwells Protectorate, brought anxious times
in Rutland. Abel Barkers links with parliamentarians were well known,
although his extended correspondence with the regicide Colonel Thomas Waite had
used a discreet code of initials rather than names. However, there is no
evidence of Abel ever having borne arms against the king. His growing wealth
and local status, reinforced by newly acquired connections with the Royalist
Noels, secured his continued respect. Early in 1660 Abel Barker was serving as
Treasurer for Rutland, being requested by a local magistrate to pay 20
shillings to an Oakham carpenter, Thomas Crampe, suffering from leprosy (HMC V,
403). With the Restoration imminent Abel took care to confirm his political
reliability. The preserved copy of a Loyal Address to Charles II,
in Abels handwriting and signed with the names or marks of 51 Rutland
villagers, suggests that he was working hard to demonstrate his allegiance to
the Stuart dynasty. With elections to a new parliament and the fiery Royalist,
the second Viscount Campden, installed as the first Lord Lieutenant of Rutland
(as distinct from Leicestershire and Rutland), Abel had to act quickly to deny
rumoured accusations of disloyalty: |
|
Hambleton, 16 March 60
[1661, New Style] |
|
(DE 730/4 283) |
|
|
|
Ten days later Abel
was nervously reassuring his father-in-law that he fully supported Lord
Campdens son in the elections to the Cavalier Parliament. It was crucial
to maintain the good will of the Noels and Sherards, dominant families under
the new dispensation: in 1661 Edward Noel, later to be Earl of Gainsborough,
achieved the desired election as Knight of theShire together with Philip
Sherard (Wright 1684, Additions XVI). But by August of that year Abel felt
secure in his reputation and financial prospects. Looking around for a good
investment, he heard that the desirable manor of neighbouring Lyndon might be
on the market: |
|
|
|
For Mr Wray a
Scrivener between the Two Temple Gates. |
|
A. B. Hambleton 12 August
1661 |
|
(DE 730/4
286) |
|
|
|
While Abel was
protecting and enhancing his interests within the county community, Mary now
found herself the harassed mother of three young daughters, Mary and the twins
Thomasin and Elizabeth. Her letter of 26 May 1661, addressed to Abel at
the Dog and Ball in Fleet Street near the New Pageant contains a
postscript longer than the letter itself: |
|
(DE730/1 53) |
|
|
|
Despite Marys
fears for her mother-in-laws health, Mrs Elizabeth Barker lived on to
appear in the 1665 Hearth Tax records with her home in Hambleton of five
hearths, a considerable property although half the size of her sons home.
In answer to Marys urgent summons, her next letter of 2 June 1661 records
the arrival at Mrs Barkers ofmy sister Colling..., my sister
Goodman [Abels sister Elizabeth] and my brother Greene [the husband of
Abels sister Mary]. Clearly the family were anxious for the weak
condition and fluctuating strength of the matriarch. Smallpox was still rife in
the neighbourhood, but Mary informed her husband with relief that the family
remained free of the disease, although: |
|
|
|
My poor children are all
sadly troubled with the chin cough. Mall is much the worst. They have such fits
that it stops their wind and puts me into such frights and fears that I am not
myself.. I have my share of troubles in the world and always the worst in your
absence... |
|
(DE 730/1 54) |
|
|
|
One of these troubles
concerned her mother-in-laws servant, Mall Rit [Wright?] who is described
as so cross a creature, I did not know what she might do... your mother
would not endure the sight of her. The offending Mall arrived with her
clothes to stay at Abels home, to his wifes great annoyance:
She is a bad creature, but I will let all alone till your
return. |
|
(DE 730/1 55) |
|
|
|
From the noisy and
probably smelly vicinity of the Smithfield pens, Abel Barker moved his London
lodgings within a week to the Flower de Luce [Fleur de Lys] and Crown
over against St Clements Church door in the Strand. During this
stay in London, the occasion when he probably first heard of the possibility of
purchasing land at Lyndon, Abel was able to make use of the new postal service
to communicate with his family in Rutland. In 1662 the first Royal Mail was
officially launched, with services out of London from a central post office,
carried by post horses, post or public coaches, or carriers carts.
According to Liza Picard, Restoration London,
1997, the service took between 3 and 25 days, with
a charge made on delivery. Marys reply to this address is dated
5 July
1661: |
|
(DE 730/1 56) |
|
|
|
In October 1661 Abel
Barker was at home in Hambleton, receiving news from Marys uncle,
Geoffrey Palmer, that Hugh Audley was ready to sell Lyndon and would demand
around £9400, £500 more than he had paid for the land. As newly
appointed Attorney General to Charles II and recently knighted, Sir Geoffrey
Palmers influential position must have offered useful connections which
his Rutland relation would not be slow to exploit. The following letter of 16
February lacks a year to date it precisely, but references in that and the next
to the purchase of Lyndon suggest the following year, 1662 [New Style, being
before the former start of the year on 25
March]. Abel was now using the address of Sir
Geoffrey Palmers old chamber in the Temple Churchyard, where
the following plaintive missive arrived: |
|
(DE 730/1
58) |
|
Presumably Abel Barker
had personal reasons for not sharing with his wife news of the progressing
plans to purchase Lyndon jointly with his brother Thomas. Mary, however, had
concerns of her own. As the daughter of a younger branch of an ennobled family,
she must have been keenly aware of the importance of adequate financial
provision for her three daughters, since the heir to the estate would obviously
be her stepson, Thomas. The following letter, addressed again to her husband at
Sir Geoffrey Palmers old chamber, reveal Marys fears
for future security, amid a profusion of more immediate domestic crises.
Although undated, its postscript suggests a date of February
1662: |
|
(DE 730 1
58A) |
|
|
|
After long Puritan
years of austerity, the marking of Valentines Day, with other annual
festivals, was revived at the Restoration. In the same year that Mary Barker
belatedly selected her husband, Samuel Pepys wrote on February 14th: I
did this day purposely shun to be seen at Sir W. Battens, because I would
not have his daughter to be my Valentine, as she was last year ... (Pepys, i
226). |
|
(DE 730/1 72) |
|
|
|
The Farrendine gown
which Mary intended to wear as mourning for her uncle was a cloth of silk and
wool. The suit of knots to decorate it was a set of ribbon bows
applied to a gown or sometimes worn on the head. (Cunnington and Beard,
Dictionary of English Costume, London 1960). Mary was anxious to know the
appropriate and fashionable mourning style of the time, since in a subsequent
letter to the same address, dated 17 May 1670, she added further details to the
requested purchases. It is interesting that, following Abels obvious
reluctance to share details of the purchase of Lyndon with his wife, her
letters appear solely concerned with domestic and traditionally feminine
interests: |
|
(DE 730/1 73) |
|
|
|
The reference to
Thomas Barkers conversations with Miss Fawkener, of the influential
Uppingham family, suggests a possible suit of marriage, although Wright (1684)
gives no record of any marriage taking place and Thomas died in 1680 without
issue. |
|
M Barker. |
|
(DE 730/1) |
|
|
|
Two years later, on 2
November 1675, we learn that Marys step-son, the young heir Thomas, now
aged 18, was assuming greater responsibilities on the estate in his
fathers absence, while Mary reported on the various activities of
employees: |
|
(DE 730/1) |
|
|
|
Marys final
letter in this fascinating collection is dated 25 November 1675 and written to
Sir Abel who had presumably stayed throughout the month at the same London
address. |
|
(DE 730 1/76) |
|
|
|
No further letters
survive to record the familys move to Lyndon Hall (Fig. 5), which took place around 1677.
Perhaps, finally, Mary might have felt confident that they had achieved a
desired level of social prominence, so that she and her daughters could move in
noble circles fashionably dressed and living in appropriate grandeur. The house
was well furnished and protected: in 1677 Sir Abel purchased 24 yards of
printed Kidderminster for £2, as well as a suit of 12
locks, 12 staples and 2 master keys for £3.10s. A small manuscript
volume of accounts covering this period shows that Lady Mary received an
allowance of £200 per annum for housekeeping, but still spent no more
than £50 yearly
on clothes for herself and her three daughters. The womens horizons
remained restricted to Rutland, while for Sir Abel and his son a twenty-day
trip to London cost £8, covering coach, horses and lodgings. |
|
Burke, J & 113,
A Genealogical and Heraldic History of the Extinct
and Dormant Baronetcies of England (London
1838). |
|
Cox, Bane,
Place Names of Rutland (vols. LXVH-LXIX, EPNS 1994). |
|
Wright, James, History and Antiquities of the County of Rutland (London 1684, republished 1973). |
|
|